We live in a modern world where there’s more than one way to do the same thing with different approaches. This applies everywhere including the tech world. A plethora of concepts and technologies are coming at the front every single day, leaving no room for outdated and traditional techniques. Not only tech giant, every company seems like making most of the technology to stay ahead of the rest. To do so, one needs to be aware of trend-setter technologies and modern concepts which are proven as money-spinning aspects for the majority of the industry verticals.
Mobile becomes a mainstream strategy. One thing that hasn’t changed over the years is the influence of mobile apps on business organizations. Mobility continues to drive sales and it is a wise decision to invest in mobile app development at present. While there is no straightforward formula for making your app successful, paying equal attention to several factors can help you win the game. The factors may include engagement ratio, time-to-market, exposure, ground-breaking marketing strategy, and budget of an app.
Here, in this article, we will discuss how you can frame appropriate strategies that ultimately earn you success. We will talk about cross-platform apps, hybrid apps, native apps and tools such as NativeScript and Ionic and, also a detailed NativeScript vs. Ionic comparison.
Cross-Platform App Development: Agile, Advanced, and Accurate
Cross-platform apps can run on multiple platforms using the same code base which attracts many developers and organizations to embrace it. It is one of the most-discussed topics of this era with the topnotch frameworks, tools, and technologies.
Native apps, on the other side, are built using a specific language for a specific mobile operating system (Object C for iOS and Java for Android). Many believe that native apps offer unparalleled user experience and functionalities that can’t match by other types of apps.
Hybrid App Development: Single Code Base, Multiple Platforms
Hybrid apps feel like a native app.
If we talk about the tools for developing such apps, there are two leading frameworks to consider – NativeScript and Ionic. Let’s take a look at the differences between them and explore their pros and cons step-by-step.
Currently, Ionic 4 is about to hit the market after the successful launch of Ionic 3 and Ionic 2. It is expected that a new version of Ionic must equip with many new features and enhancements that can take hybrid app development to the next level.
Ionic is evolved to a great extent since its origin and has a sustainable future in the app development market as per the current scenario. With Ionic, you can build a single app for multiple platforms leveraging web technologies. It uses plugins like PhoneGap/Cordova to deliver the native-like experience.
History And Current Trends:
Ionic offers the complete solution for hybrid mobile app development. Ionic was created in 2013 by Drifty who previously developed products like Codiqa and Jetstrap. Max Lynch, Ben Sperry, and Adam Bradley decided to come up with something innovative that would meet the modern web standards and that’s how they launched Ionic.
According to Wikipedia, Ionic developers reportedly created over 1.3M apps with the SDK. At present, there is a lot of buzz around Ionic 3 and Ionic 4 and most recent release, Ionic 4 (a beta version is already out) is power packed with advanced features.
“Ionic 4 continues to solidify its roots as Angular’s leading mobile solution. And we’re taking it even further by adopting new Angular tooling and features, ensuring that Ionic apps follow Angular standards and conventions, and benefit immediately from new Angular features the community has to offer.”
-Ionic Framework Official Blog Post
NativeScript development has gained in popularity worldwide due to its extraordinary features and capability to build native apps for iOS and Android.
Here are some backing points which might help you recognize the popularity of this framework.
- Soon after the public release in March 2015, it received 3000 GitHub Stars and over 1500 followers on Twitter.
- There are more than 700 plugins are available in the market.
- Progress, founder of NativeScript named a “visionary” in Gartner Magic Quadrant for Mobile App Dev Platforms (MADP).
One of the key differences between both these frameworks is that NativeScript apps can directly run on the native device. It does not need any cross-compiling or necessary browser interaction.
Unlike NativeScript, Ionic needs plugins to cover app in native appearance. And it can be done without any hassle through command line tool.
They almost do the same thing with different models. The applications are, however, cross-platform apps whether you use Ionic or NativeScript. Both, Ionic and NativeScript leverage AngularJS which is, again, pretty good for developers and organizations.
Note: NativeScript 2.0 allows using Angular to build apps.
Where NativeScript Wins Over Ionic?
The users of the NativeScript framework are growing rapidly. There are more and more developers and success stories are added to NativeScript community. As far as ease-of-use and user experience are taken into account, NativeScript wins the battle. It offers sound structure through mobile-ready feature which will sooner or later; take NativeScript framework on a much higher level.
When Is Ionic Your Go-To Framework?
Ionic app development delivers excellent performance across all the platforms. The supported platforms are Android, iOS, and Universal Windows Platform (UWP) when you create apps with Ionic. The key benefit of Ionic isn’t the periodic evolution or an update. It allows developers to leverage Angular and this same reflects in Ionic 2 and 3.
However, it relies on WebViews to build the interface and uses plugins to access device hardware features.
Ionic vs NativeScript: A Quick Comparison
|Platform||A software framework for hybrid app development||Cross-platform apps|
|Founders||Drifty.co||Telerik by Progress|
|Stable Release||November 2017||May 2018|
|Key difference||Uses plugins to access system features||Support for native iOS and Android libraries|
|Native Performance||There’s a need to use Apache Cordova API to access device hardware||Gives access to entire native API|
|Performance||There are some Performance issues and lack of native UI component||Seamless performance due to 100% native API access|
|Companies who are using||Techstars, MarketWatch, TD Trading, Sworkit, Chefsteps, Nationwide, Untapped, Cryptochange||Work Box, Zege Technologies, GeekyAnts, Navadra, Whoz.com, Zdravel|
|Features||Support for all modern web standards
Numerous plugins and robust community
Angular makes it easy to work with
|Angular and Vue Interaction
Native API access
|Suitable for||Hybrid mobile apps,
App development is faster due to rapid testing functionality
|Truly native mobile apps
High-Performance UX-UI based apps
The Benefits of Ionic:
- Single codebase can be used for Android, iOS, Windows, and Web apps
- Huge community support and plenty of plugins are available
- Fast development testing cycle
- Allows leveraging Angular to create customized components
The Drawbacks of Ionic:
- Angular 1 to Angular 2 needs a huge learning curve
- Lack of native experience
- Need to use third-party plugins to access native features
The Pros of NativeScript:
- Offers seamless user experience
- One code base for developing apps for the majority of the platforms
The Cons of NativeScript:
- App size is larger than the Ionic and React Native
- No HTML and DOM support in NativeScript
- Fewer examples are available as it is new
There are endless possibilities. You can choose any of these frameworks to convert your idea into reality. If you feel anything is missing in this NativeScript vs. Ionic comparison, you can tell us via comments below.