The web development framework is employed as support and provides an efficient way to develop an application. It moves closer with different functionalities and features, which makes the process of development easy, and developers always find a faster way to code.
A few of the frameworks often come with extraordinary features, which reduce the code and make application development faster and smarter. Hence the increasing demand for frameworks has led to the invention of a lot of frameworks, providing multiple options to choose from. Hence, it’s a difficult task to keep updated with the latest web development technologies and choose what.
So today let’s compare the two highly demanding technologies, Nest.js Vs Next.js, continuously gathering the user’s attention. Both have picked up growth in less time.
What is Nest.js?
Nest.js is an open-source, progressive Node.js framework, which was created by Kamil Mysliwiec to help with the development of scalable server-side applications. Nest.js offers cross-platform functionality and combines the concepts of OOPS (Object-Oriented Programming) and FP (Functional Programming).
Next js was discovered to resolve the architectural problems which occurred in Node.js by providing a structure to organize the code in a different modular structure. Moreover, it is written in typescript which enables type-checking.
It provides extensive flexibility to the developer, to use any other libraries as and when required and to maintain the applications.
#2 Full-Stack Development:
It is useful for full-stack development because it can be used in conjunction with any front-end framework which allows for seamless integration between front-end and back-end.
#3 Extensive Support for Modules:
It supports various modules and provides integration with many technologies (e.g. mongoose, WebSocket, etc.).
What is Next.js?
Next.js is a React front-end development web framework created by Vercel (formerly Zeit) in 2016. Which is assisting with the functionalities such as server-side rendering and static site generation.
It is designed for edifice full-stack web applications. Using React Components for UI increases the features and optimizations. It imparts advanced features like automatic code splitting, TypeScript, server-side rendering, and many more. Additionally, it qualifies the sharp and efficient coding for high-performance apps.
Being built on React, it holds most of its features, and additionally, it does not require any web pack configurations. That is the only reason the developers have found it more efficient compared to others.
Essential Reasons to Choose Next.js:
#1 Server-Side Rendering (SSR):
SSR means the web pages are generated and rendered on the server side which means the client browser will receive a fully formatted HTML document, which helps us to make the web page faster and efficient.
#2 Router Configurations:
It provides a specific router that needs to be installed while working with Next.js. Additionally, it configures itself and requires no additional configuration.
#3 Ability to Pre-render Web Page at Build Time:
It is also called SSG (Static Site Generation), and it is a built-in feature in Next.js, employing a web development technique where web pages are pre-rendered at build time instead of dynamically rendered on the server or client side.
Modular Architecture Support: This feature allows developers to classify their code into reusable and decoupled modules. This makes it easier to manage complex applications and encourages code reuse.
Build-in DI Support: It has built-in support for dependency injection which helps to make it easier to write modular and sustainable code.
Scalability: It is designed to be highly scalable. It leverages the event-driven architecture and the reactive programming model to handle a huge number of concurrent requests capably.
Prompt Compatibility: It is built on top of the Express.js framework, utilizing its robust features while adding its additional abstractions and functionality. This ensures compatibility with the vast Express middleware ecosystem, allowing easy integration of existing Express middleware and libraries.
Great Community Support: It has excellent documentation that provides comprehensive explanations, tutorials, and examples.
Disadvantages of Nest.js:
Standardized Code: Although it offers a robust foundation and architectural guidance, developers may find themselves writing more code when compared to using minimalist frameworks. The emphasis on modularity and the separation of concerns, while beneficial for maintaining a well-organized codebase, can occasionally result in additional boilerplate code, potentially extending development time.
Performance Overhead: While it is generally efficient and performs well, the additional abstractions and layers it introduces, in contrast to minimal frameworks like Express, may lead to a slight performance overhead. Nevertheless, for the majority of applications, the impact on performance is minimal and is outweighed by the productivity benefits.
Limited Ecosystem: Despite its compatibility with Express middleware, Nest.js has a comparatively smaller ecosystem compared to frameworks such as Express or Koa. Consequently, locating specific plugins or libraries tailored for Nest.js might be more challenging, although the community is continually expanding.
Advantages & Disadvantages of Next.js:
Advantages of Next.js:
User Experience: It provides a marvelous and interactive user experience and offers you the freedom to create a user interface according to your needs.
RapidDevelopment: It contains many ready-to-use components as well as libraries, which are useful for faster and more rapid development.
Automatically Reduce Page Load Time: it is internally managing the necessary loading of JS and CSS which helps us to reduce the page load time and improves the user experience.
SEO-Friendly: as we all know SEO is helpful to our application’s ranking by indexing the site in the top SERPs. It improves SEO by providing server-side rendering by default. Additionally, it provides the ability to add meta-tags dynamically inside the head components.
Community Support: It has large community support. If you face any issues, it is easy to get the solutions quickly.
Disadvantages of Next.js:
Very low number of Plugins: compared to other technologies, it does not provide the expected number of plugins.
Increase Your Cost for Front-end Development: It doesn’t provide as many as in-built front-end pages and it requires you to develop the front-end from scratch and update it promptly which increases your cost to hire a new resource for front-end development.
Next.js vs Nest.js: Key Differences
Architecture and Structure
Next.js follows a simple file structure, where pages are created as components with a filename matching the page URL.
Nest.js follows a modular architecture based on modules and controllers.
Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
Next.js provides built-in support for server-side rendering, which enables developers to render pages on the server before sending them to the client.
Nest.js does not provide built-in support for server-side rendering. However, you can use it in combination with other libraries, such as React, to enable server-side rendering.
Next.js is primarily focused on client-side development, but it does provide support for API routes.
Nest.js, on the other hand, is primarily focused on server-side development and provides built-in support for creating RESTful APIs.
Next.js provides a built-in feature to create a static site, which allows us to generate pages at build time, which enables faster page load times and improved performance.
Nest.js provides a modular architecture that allows developers to scale their applications by breaking them down into smaller, reusable components.
Next.js provides a built-in feature that supports server-side rendering, which outcomes in faster page load times and improved SEO.
Nest.js provides a highly optimized runtime functionality that ensures the fast and efficient execution of code.
Community Support and Popularity
Next.js has gained remarkable popularity in the recent few years, with many large companies using it to build their web applications.
Nest.js is also gaining popularity and has become a go-to choice for many developers especially when they want to build server-side applications.
Next.js is relatively easier to learn, as it provides a simpler file structure and fewer abstractions.
On the other hand, Nest.js requires a huge understanding of TypeScript and more complex concepts such as dependency injection.
Next.js provides a set of tools and utilities which is helpful to simplify the testing process and make it easier to write in terms of testing.
Nest.js provides a robust testing framework that allows us to write unit tests and integration tests for their applications.
Next.js can be deployed to various hosting platforms, including Vercel, Netlify, and AWS. Deployment is relatively straightforward, as Next.js applications can be deployed as serverless functions or static files.
Nest.js applications can be deployed to any hosting platform that supports Node.js, making it highly flexible and adaptable to different deployment environments.
Next.js is primarily focused on client-side development and provides a set of tools and features which is helpful to simplify the development process. However, it is less flexible than Nest.js, as it provides fewer abstractions and less modularity.
Nest.js, on the other hand, is highly flexible and provides a modular architecture that allows developers to create complex applications with ease.
Next.js provides a set of guidelines and tutorials that cover all aspects of the framework, from installation to deployment.
Nest.js provides a detailed documentation site which is covering all aspects of the framework, including core concepts, modules, and utilities.
Nest.js vs Next.js: The Similarities
#1 Framework Environment and Community Backing:
When choosing a development tool, it is crucial to consider the supporting community and environmental considerations.
Next.js leverages its association with well-established frameworks and development tools in the React ecosystem, providing a distinct advantage. The framework is further boosted by outstanding documentation and an active community that is supporting its development.
Built on TypeScript with a significant influence from Angular, Nest.js taps into the robust development communities of both ecosystems. It not only provides a comprehensive array of components, libraries, and tools for streamlined development tasks but also encourages the adoption of standard procedures.
#2 Efficiency and Scalability in Operation:
While designed for distinct use cases, both excel in delivering exceptional speed and versatility.
Next.js, with its server-side rendering capabilities and automatic code splitting, is particularly adept at enhancing front-end efficiency. Tailored for static websites and content-centric applications, it ensures swift loading times and improved SEO performance.
Nest.js places a greater emphasis on server-side and backend speed. It truly puts a shine on when it comes to developing APIs and microservices that demand high performance and the ability to handle substantial traffic volumes.
#3 Mastery and User Interaction in Development:
Any framework’s learning curve and the proficiency of developers can significantly impact project timelines and overall efficiency. For instance,
For React developers, learning Next.js is straightforward due to its seamless integration with React. Moreover, developers accustomed to working with React will find Next.js architecture and standards intuitive, easing the transition.
In contrast, while Nest.js employs TypeScript and Angular technologies, it requires developers to grasp its architectural guidelines and dependency injection techniques. Consequently, individuals unfamiliar with TypeScript or Angular-like frameworks may face a steeper learning curve.
Every web application developer looking to build a high-quality app faces various situations. The next and Nest JS are the two most prominent frameworks that help them deal with critical situations conveniently.
They serve the required things for each developer’s needs, and they create the best result in business growth. Also, as per the GitHub response, Next JS is a preferred choice over Nest JS. Also, Nest is much more convenient to use and understand.
When choosing between Next.js and Nest.js, consider your project’s requirements. Both frameworks, with robust ecosystems and community support, enable the construction of efficient web applications.
SPEC INDIA, as your single stop IT partner has been successfully implementing a bouquet of diverse solutions and services all over the globe, proving its mettle as an ISO 9001:2015 certified IT solutions organization. With efficient project management practices, international standards to comply, flexible engagement models and superior infrastructure, SPEC INDIA is a customer’s delight. Our skilled technical resources are apt at putting thoughts in a perspective by offering value-added reads for all.